Legal Opinion

State v. Carlisle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1974No. 51PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

In order to obtain a license to operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways, the applicant must by examination, satisfy the Department of Motor Vehicles that he is mentally and physically competent to operate a motor vehicle without undue risk to other travelers. The law recognizes that one who has been found to be competent may lose his competency and become an undue hazard before the date his permit expires. Hence, provision is made for revocation of the license for cause. Thus when the holder of a permit becomes a menace to others on the highways by accumulating such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. EllettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  4. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Everhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  5. Henry v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API