Legal Opinion

Reliance Motor Co. v. Craig

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The single question presented is whether jurisdiction of the Reliance Motor Company was acquired by service on Cox. The undisputed facts are that the Reliance Motor Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois. Prior to June, 1927, it had a branch ai Keokuk. C. C. Cox was its manager at Keokuk- He was not an officer, “not a stockholder, and had no financial interest in it.” “He was simply an employee.” In June, 1927, the Keokük Auto Sales Company was organized as a corporation. Metzger, the majority stockholder of the Reliance Motor Company, became a stockholder…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Hunter v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garber v. Bancamerica-Blair CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Kalbach v. Service Station Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Thornburg v. James R. Bennett & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Sivertsen v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
  5. Walter M. Toole Co. v. Distributors Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API