Legal Opinion

Rodrigues-Novo v. Recchi America, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 2004No. 11, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

We have been asked in this case to determine whether, under the provisions of the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act, the Washington Metropolitan Transportation Authority (hereinafter “WMATA”) was a “statutory employer” of Joao Rodrigues-Novo and, thus, immune from tort liability. This case comes to us by a Certified Question from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Maryland Code, §§ 12-601 through 12-613 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (1974, 2002 Repl.Vol.), 1 and Maryland Rule 8-305. 2 In the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Honaker v. W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Brady v. Ralph Parsons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. State v. Benjamin F. Bennett Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. W.M. Schlosser Co. v. Uninsured Employer's FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Elms v. Renewal by AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Hancock v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. James v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API