Legal Opinion

Quell v. Boyajian

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1926No. Appeal 318PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Hendeeson, J.,

The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the appellant on a claim for a commission alleged to have been earned in arranging a mortgage loan for the defendant. The loan was not effected, but the plaintiff asserts that he complied with a request of the defendant to place two mortgages, a first mortgage for $7000, and a second building and loan association mortgage for $6000; the commission to be 3% on the first mortgage, and 10% on the second. Evidence was offered to show that a party was found willing to take the first mortgage, and that the Ajax Building and Loan…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  2. Porter v. HealySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Bird Coal & Iron Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Wilkinson v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Allegheny By-Product Coke Co. v. J. H. Hillman & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Trust Co. CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Pollock v. MacElreeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Samuel Levin v. Sol. SieffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Bennet EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Luzerne County · 1959
  5. Oriental Hall Assn. v. Allen Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API