Legal Opinion

Allegheny By-Product Coke Co. v. J. H. Hillman & Sons Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1922No. Appeal, No. 101PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadleb,

Both plaintiff and defendant are Pennsylvania corporations, the former chartered in 1915, having for its purpose the manufacture and sale of coke and its byproducts, and the latter authorized to buy, sell and deal in coal, coke, pig-iron and other materials, and act as brokers in the purchase and sale of these commodities.

The By-Products Company secured a plant in operation at Glassport, and began its relations with Hillman & Sons Company by entering into two contracts, one of which made provision for the supplying of such coal as might be necessary in it's…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Little v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  3. McConville v. InghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Rossmassler v. SpielbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kribbs v. JACKSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Trounstine v. Bauer, Pogue & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Smyth Sales, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Evans v. MOFFATSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API