Legal Opinion
Pollock v. MacElree
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 20, 1944No. 3227PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
The issue having come to trial on complaint and answer, and having heard the testimony of witnesses and arguments of counsel, I make the following
Findings of Fact
1. During the period in which the present claim arose, plaintiff, Hugh A. Pollock, was Manager of the Automobile Division of the Crosley Corporation.
2. In his capacity as Manager of the Automobile Division of the Crosley Corporation the plaintiff had charge of the Company’s dealings with its distributors.
3. Plaintiff’s employment as Manager of the Automobile Division by the Crosley Corporation was a full-time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Atlee v. FinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Reilly v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. FlaniganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Auerbach v. CurieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colonell v. GoodmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Albright v. KalbitzerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Cox v. McCarter, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1956