Legal Opinion

Leach v. Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 26, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The principal questions raised are whether the Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank was acting as agent for collection, or was merely acting in ita own behalf, in the capacity of drawee and payer, and whether remittance by draft was in accordance with the authority and instructions given to it by claimant.

The Farmers & Merchants Bank was not a member of the Federal Reserve Bank. On January 1, 1922, the Farmers & Merchants Bank expressed to the Federal- Reserve Bank the “wish that you might send our items directly to us for collection.” The Federal Reserve Bank replied:

* * we are writing the First…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Messenger v. Carroll Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  2. Leach v. Farmers Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Andrew v. State Bank of DexterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Leach v. Citizens' St. Bank of ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Sherman v. LindersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrew v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Orlich v. Rubio Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Andrew v. Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Andrew v. Helmer & Gortner State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Bates v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API