Legal Opinion

Leach v. Citizens' St. Bank of Arthur

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

The facts are not-in dispute. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago sent by mail, direct' to the Citizens’ State Bank of Arthur, checks drawn by various parties on the latter bank. The checks were sent in two lots, -and with each was a communication called a cash letter, which read: - >'

“We enclose herewith for collection and remittance, at par items listed below.”. - - ■ . - . : ■ ■

The Citizens' State Ba~ak charged the various checks to the accounts &f the several drawers, and i~sued its two draJ~ts u~on the Continental & Commercial National Bank of Chicago, payable to the order of the Federal…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Bank of Poplar Bluff v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Federal Reserve Bank v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. The People v. . Merchants and Mechanics' Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Messenger v. Carroll Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leach v. Iowa State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. In re the Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Leach v. Exchange St. Bank of StuartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. ButtonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Leach v. Farmers & Merchants Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API