Antco Shipping Company v. Yukon Compania Naviera, SA
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant Yukon Compañía Naviera, S.A., (hereinafter referred to as “Yukon”) moves pursuant to Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (hereinafter referred to as the “Supplemental Rules”), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) to vacate an allegedly illegal maritime attachment and dismiss the instant complaint on the grounds of insufficiency of process, lack of in personam jurisdiction, and because another identical cause of action is pending in the United States District Court in Massachusetts.
From the papers before me it appears that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Seawind Compania, S. A. v. Crescent Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Cia. Naviera Continental S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd., Docket No. 05-5385-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Integrated Container Service, Inc. v. Starlines Container Shipping, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- East Asiatic Co., Ltd. v. Indomar, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Bay Casino, LLC. v. M/V ROYAL EMPRESSDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Marimed Shipping Inc. v. Persian Gulf Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.