Legal Opinion

East Asiatic Co., Ltd. v. Indomar, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 17, 1976No. 75 Civ. 2648 (CHT)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TENNEY, District Judge.

Indomar, Ltd. (“Indomar”), a Bahamian corporation, moves pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) for an order correcting and amending a default judgment entered against it as defendant in an admiralty proceeding. The original action arose in connection with an alleged breach of a charter party between Indomar and East Asiatic Co., Ltd. (“East Asiatic”), the plaintiffs in the prior action and the current opponents to the motion to amend. Indomar defaulted, and judgment was had against it for $1,149,577.77, the entire amount…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd., Docket No. 05-5385-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Navieros Inter-Americanos, S.A. v. M/V Vasilia ExpressCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Maritime Ventures International, Inc. v. Caribbean Trading & Fidelity, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. Integrated Container Service, Inc. v. Starlines Container Shipping, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Engineering Equipment Co. v. SS SELENEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API