Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2006No. 20050326, 20050337, 20050338PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] In these consolidated cases, Thomas Pinks appeals from a judgment of conviction for being in actual physical control of an automobile while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs and possession of marijuana paraphernalia, and Billie Campbell appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia. Both claim the admission of a state crime laboratory report violated their Sixth Amendment right to confrontation because the report was a testimonial statement under the holding of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. VerdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. State v. MarchSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. State v. PasqualoneOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Magruder v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. City of Belfield v. KilkennyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API