Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coella v. Fenimore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1891No. 134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus;

1Opinion of the Court

*371The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

— Relator was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to death. He gave notice of appeal to this court, and to perfect the same sought to have the clerk transmit a transcript of the record. The clerk declined to do this unless the fees for preparing the same were first paid. Relator thereupon showed that he was without means, and was absolutely unable to pay such fees. Under these circumstances, relator was entitled to such transcript at the expense of the public. The writ of mandamus must issue as prayed.

Anders, C. J., and Stiles…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. MatzdorffWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Teeter v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State ex rel. Mahoney v. RonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. Marr v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API