Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mahoney v. Ronald

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1921No. 16913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application filed in thé supreme court November 3, 1921, for a writ of mandamus to compel the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., to supply relator a transcript on appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHovey, J.

An alternative writ of mandate was heretofore issued by this court requiring the respondent, as superior judge, to show cause why he should not be required to enter an order requiring the prosecuting attorney of King county and the court reporter in the employ of said prosecuting attorney to supply a transcript of the testimony and proceeding of the trial court in a certain cause theretofore tried in said court in which the state of Washington was plaintiff and the relator, James E. Mahoney, was the defendant.

Respondent first demurred to the petition, but, upon argument, waived any question…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Martin v. WoffordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Jeffries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Stowe v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Coella v. FenimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. State ex rel. Langhorne v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. MatzdorffWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. AshbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  4. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Cheney v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API