Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Marr v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1931No. 23147. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In this proceeding in this court on an alternative writ of certiorari, relator prays that the peremptory writ issue requiring respondent judge to direct the official court reporter in and for Pierce county to furnish a longhand copy of the testimony in a criminal case, upon the ground that relator is indigent.

In the court below, relator filed a motion, supported by an affidavit, in which he alleged that he is an indigent person, not possessed of any money or property .of any character or description, and has no means of raising any money; that he has no property save and excepting his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. State v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Stowe v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Rochford v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Mahoney v. RonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cheney v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Bird v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Bird v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API