Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Wilkie
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2006No. 04-8016PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff-Appellee Harvey Frank Robbins filed suit pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Robbins alleges employees of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), including Defendants-Appellants Charles Wilkie, Darrell Barnes, Teryl Shryack, Michael Miller, Gene Leone, and David Wallace, attempted to extort a right-of-way across Robbins’ property in violation of RICO *760and the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roger Fairley and Richard Gackowski v. Evan Fermaint, Noberto Bercasio, and Fred CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Gillmor v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Maxxon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Mocek v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Robbins v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.