Curl v. Pacific Home
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VICKERS, J. pro tem.
The defendant corporation maintains the Pacific Home as a home for elderly people. In 1941 the parties hereto entered into a written contract whereby plaintiff paid defendant $6,050 and defendant accepted her as a life member of the home and agreed to provide her with “room 201 over the dining hall” and with board, laundry and medical care. Plaintiff, who at the time was 65 years of age, thereupon entered the home and continued to reside therein and receive the specified benefits until June 7, 1950. On that day she was informed by the superintendent that her life…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Otto v. ProtectiveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Wachtel v. Noah Widows & Orphans' Benevolent SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola De Beneficencia MutuaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Gorman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Ascherman v. San Francisco Medical SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Aldrich v. Transcontinental Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978