Legal Opinion
Petersburg Cellular Partnership, D/B/A 360o Communications Company, United States of America, Intervenor v. Board of Supervisors of Nottoway County
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 7, 2000No. 99-1055PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote an opinion, Parts I and II in which Judge KING concurred. Judge WILDENER wrote an opinion concurring in the judgement. Judge KING wrote a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
After Nottoway County, Virginia, denied 360° Communications Company a conditional use permit to erect a 199-foot wireless communications tower, the district court issued a writ of mandamus directing the County’s Board of Supervisors to issue the permit. The district court reversed the County’s decision after applying the “substantial evidence” standard imposed on the…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- Preferred Sites, LLC v. Troup CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- New Par, D/B/A Verizon Wireless v. City of SaginawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- 360° Communications Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Albemarle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. City of Newport NewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States Cellular Telephone of Greater Tulsa, L.L.C. v. City of Broken ArrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.