Legal Opinion
New Par, D/B/A Verizon Wireless v. City of Saginaw
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2002No. 01-2083PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant, the City of Saginaw, Michigan, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Plaintiff-Appellee, New Par d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“New Par”). In March 2000, New Par, a provider of cellular telephone service, sought to obtain a building permit from Saginaw in order to erect a cellular tower. Because New Par’s property did not meet Saginaw’s minimum-size zoning requirements for “light industrial” use, New Par requested a variance from Saginaw’s Zoning Board of Appeals. Following New Par’s presentation of its request at two…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of RoswellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Unified Government Wyandotte County KsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- T-MOBILE SOUTH LLC v. City of Jacksonville, Fla.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
- Primeco Personal Communications, Limited Partnership, D/B/A Verizon Wireless v. City of Mequon, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Metropcs, Inc. v. The City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.