Legal Opinion

People v. Pustau

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1940No. Crim. 3288PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Prom a judgment of conviction upon an indictment charging him with the crime of perjury, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant prosecutes this appeal. The perjury is alleged to have been committed by defendant in the course of his testimony given before the grand jury of Los Angeles County. The indictment reveals that at the time of defendant’s appearance before it as a witness, that body was engaged in an inquisi= tion and investigation into charges concerning the alleged asking and receiving of a bribe in violation of section 68 of the Penal Code and also the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. Lem YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. People v. MacKenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. SicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. GuastiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API