Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, constituting three partnerships and one individual separately engaged in operating retail liquor stores in Chicago and suburbs, ¡brought this action in the District Court under Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, “ as a class action for the benefit of the plaintiffs and all the parties named in plaintiffs’ Exhibit 1 attached * * * in pursuance of the provisions of Rule 23(a) (3) of the Federal Rules of Procedure [28 U.S.C.A.],” averring that all these parties and others not specifically named constitute a class so numerous as to make it impractical to bring all of them…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.