Legal Opinion
Redwood Empire Life Support v. County of Sonoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1999No. Nos. 98-15170, 98-15637PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us again to consider the scope of state action immunity from the federal antitrust laws conferred by California’s Emergency Medical Services System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act (“EMS Act”). Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 1797-1799.200.See A-1 Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. County of Monterey, 90 F.3d 333 (9th Cir.1996); Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San Mateo, 791 F.2d 755 (9th Cir.1986). Appellee Redwood Empire Life Support (“Redwood”) brought this antitrust action against Sonoma County and 911 Emergency Services,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San MateoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shames v. California Travel & Tourism CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shames v. California Travel & Tourism CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Madden v. Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Redwood Empire Life Support v. The County Of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999