Legal Opinion

Sternhagen v. Dow Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1997No. 96-161PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

The United States District Court for the District of Montana, Great Falls Division, has certified to this Court the following question:

In a strict products liability case for injuries caused by an inherently unsafe product, is the manufacturer conclusively presumed to know the dangers inherent in his product, or is state-of-the-art evidence admissible to establish whether the manufacturer knew or through the exercise of reasonable human foresight should have known of the danger?

We conclude that Montana law precludes the admission of state-of-the-art evidence in products liability cases…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. O'BRIEN v. Muskin Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Brown v. North American Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Chovanak v. MatthewsMontana Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Phillips v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Malcolm v. EVENFLO CO., INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Oberson v. Federated Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Chapman v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API