Legal Opinion

Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. Heard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1991No. S91G0333PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunt, Justice.

This case involves the construction of a shopping center store lease. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals held the lease contained an express continued use covenant as well as an implied covenant of continued operation. Piggly Wiggly Southern v. Heard, 197 Ga. App. 656 (399 SE2d 244) (1990). We granted the writ of certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals was correct in its construction of the parties’ lease, and reverse.

In 1963, the parties executed a lease in which appellees’ predecessor agreed to construct a supermarket for appellant according to plans…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kroger Co. v. Bonny Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Coffee System of Atlanta v. FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. Heyman v. Financial Properties Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. HeinemannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. DPLM, Ltd. v. J. H. Harvey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Savage v. KGE Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Thompson Development, Inc. v. Kroger Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc. v. Brunner Companies Income Properties Ltd. Partnership ICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API