Legal Opinion

Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Heinemann

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1997No. S97A0605, S97X0608PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

This case involves the misappropriation of trade secrets and the primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to issue a prohibitive injunction against the use of the misappropriated trade secrets. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a royalty injunction, we affirm.

Mark Heinemann and Patricia Pelling formerly worked for Electronic Data Systems developing computer software. While within EDS’s employ, Heinemann and Pelling worked on two programs developed by EDS, AcuPlant and AcuFile. AcuPlant is a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Medical Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Beauchamp v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Bernstein v. FagelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Coffee System of Atlanta v. FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Expedia, Inc. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Essex Group, Inc. v. Southwire Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Bearoff v. CratonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. STATE OF GEORGIA v. FEDERAL DEFENDER PROGRAM, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API