Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Schaeffer

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1921No. Civ. No. 3854PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Court of Napa County. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Certain of the heirs and devisees of Rebecca Schaeffer, deceased, and the administratrix, appeal on a question of law alone, from the order and decree settling the final account of the administratrix, and decreeing distribution of the residue of the estate. The respondent makes a preliminary objection and seeks a dismissal in the absence of a printed record.

[1] The appeal is prosecuted under the alternative method. The transcript, prepared in the manner prescribed by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, is properly authenticated by the clerk. It includes, among other papers, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Board of Education v. BlodgettIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Frank v. WareheimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  4. Edwards v. County National Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Central Union Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API