Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff for leave to amend all its pleadings by substituting a different corporate title for the plaintiff and also motions for summary judgment filed by both parties.
This case has been before this court previously on a motion for summary judgment by plaintiff and judgment was then granted to plaintiff under the first count of the complaint. That part of these proceedings is reported in 51 F.Supp. 744.
The facts are as follows: The defendant sold to Wilson Distilling Co., Inc., certain barrels of whisky and as a warehouseman issued negotiable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. HenshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Rachlin v. Libby-Owens-Ford Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Malamut v. HainesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- Timberland Lumber Co. v. Climax Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Ames Mercantile Co. v. Kimball S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Smeragulio v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962