Legal Opinion

Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1946No. Civil Action No. 5586PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, District Judge.

This is an action filed in the first instance by twenty-four (24) named plaintiffs against the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, each of whom were employees of said Company, a Pennsylvania corporation. Said action is based under a written contract for services performed beyond their ordinary and routine responsibilities, and for such services they claim to be entitled to extra compensation under the provisions of the aforesaid contract, and a recognized universal custom which existed at the time the contract was executed and the services performed.

It is set…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Allied Fire & Safety Equipment Co. v. Dick Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API