Legal Opinion
Metzenbaum v. City of Carmel-By-The-Sea
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1965No. Civ. 21669PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to enjoin an alleged violation of the zoning ordinance of the City of Carmel-By-the-Sea.
The facts are undisputed. Carmel has adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance regulating the use of private property within the city. Respondents Doud and Watson are the owners of an L-shaped parcel of land 12,000 square feet in area. The property has a frontage of 40 feet on Scenic Road and formerly had a frontage of 80 feet on Del Mar Avenue. In 1952 the city vacated and closed Del Mar Avenue in the vicinity of respondents’ property, and access to the parcel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- San-Lan Builders, Inc. v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Clarks Lane Garden Apartments, Inc. v. SchlossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Sommers v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Blumenfeld v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Metzenbaum v. City of Carmel-By-The-SeaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965