Legal Opinion

Metzenbaum v. City of Carmel-By-The-Sea

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1965No. Civ. 21669Published

1Opinion of the Court

234 Cal.App.2d 62 (1965)

MURRAY METZENBAUM, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Civ. No. 21669.

California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. Three.

Apr. 29, 1965.

Donald H. Smith for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John W. Morse, City Attorney, Hudson, Martin, Ferrante & Street and Webster Street for Defendants and Respondents.

DRAPER, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to enjoin an alleged violation of the zoning ordinance of the City of Carmel-By-the-Sea.

The facts are undisputed. Carmel has adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. San-Lan Builders, Inc. v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API