Legal Opinion
Central National Insurance v. California Insurance Guarantee
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 1985No. B006061PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SHUMSKY, J. *
Appellant and cross-complainant, The Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (Central National) appeals the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e) 1 in favor of respondent and cross-defendant, California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA). A partial dismissal was then granted. We affirm.
Appellant, "together with Signal Insurance Company (Signal) and various other insurers, issued certain insurance policies naming Leonard M. Ross and Rossco Inc. 2 as insured parties.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GandyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Biggs v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Ross v. Canadian Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. LiemsakulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Behnke v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- R. J. Reynolds Co. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.