Legal Opinion
People v. Algarin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543, 543-544 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v Burgos, 84 AD3d 975 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People of State of New York v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RalphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PembertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AllerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AllerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.