Legal Opinion
People v. Mills
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Algarin, 89 AD3d 859 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Skelos, J.E, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. AlgarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. DolberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. JiggettsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.