Legal Opinion
People v. Ralph
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 17, 2012PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was *797resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily-required period of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Algarin, 89 AD3d 859 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. AlgarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. PembertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- DAVIS, ANTWAN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- DRAKE, WALLACE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.