Legal Opinion
Zanoni v. Lynch
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 9, 2003No. AC 22873PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
An appeal to the Superior Court challenging a decree of the Probate Court for the district of Newington underlies the present appeal. The Probate Court decree authorized the defendant, Karen R. Lynch, to sell certain real property in which the plaintiffs, Rosalie B. Zanoni and Paul Zanoni, claimed to have acquired absolute title. Both plaintiffs now appeal from the judg*311ment of the trial court upholding the Probate Court’s decree. The plaintiffs claim (1) that the trial court improperly concluded that the Probate Court was authorized to order the sale of the subject property,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- H.O.R.S.E. of Connecticut, Inc. v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Satti v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Foote v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Cardillo v. CardilloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ware v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Johnson v. MazzaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Zanoni v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Scott v. HEINONENConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Greene v. Liberty BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.