Legal Opinion

Goldman v. RBC, INC.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 3, 2006No. 26178PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BURNETT:

RBC, Inc. (Petitioner) challenges the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the circuit court judge’s ruling quieting title to a strip of land containing an abandoned railway in David W. Goldman and Emilie E. Goldman (the Goldmans). We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1846, the General Assembly, anxious to encourage the building of railroads, granted a liberal charter by statute to the Wilmington & Manchester Railroad Company. In provisions typically seen in railroad charters of that era, the railroad was empowered to obtain land on which to lay track by buying it and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Eldridge v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walterboro Community Hospital, Inc. v. MeacherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Hilton Head Plantation Property Owners' Ass'n v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Foundation v. Fred's Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  4. HILTON HEAD PROP. OWNERS'ASS'N v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API