Legal Opinion

Binakonsky v. Ford Motor Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1998No. 96-2165Published

1Opinion of the Court

133 F.3d 281

Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 15,144

Charlotte BINAKONSKY, individually and as mother and next

friend of the minor children and as personal representative

of the estate of the deceased, aka David Alan Binakonsky;

Jane Marilyn Binakonsky, minor child of the deceased;

Rachel Dara Binakonsky, minor child of the deceased; Lucy

Ann Binakonsky, minor child of the deceased; Emily

Binakonsky, minor child of the deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-2165.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 2, 1997.

Decided Jan. 5, 1998.

ARGUED: Martin Henry…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API