Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Matute

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael J. Obús, J.

In what is apparently a case of second impression, defendant moves, pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (b) and 170.30 (1) (e), to dismiss the information pending against him, which now charges that he violated section 1192 (1) of the Vehicle and *989Traffic Law by operating a motor vehicle while his ability to do so was impaired by the consumption of alcohol. Although the People do not dispute that more than 90 chargeable days have elapsed since this action was commenced by the filing of a misdemeanor complaint, a question remains as to the applicability of CPL 30.30…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. FisherCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  2. People v. AbajianNew York Justice Court · 1989
  3. People v. GrahamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2011
  4. People v. MahmoodCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  5. People v. StateikinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API