Legal Opinion

Spokane & Inland Empire Railway Co. v. Wilson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1918No. Nos. 14667, 14870, 14871PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Mitchell, J., entered November 20, 1917, in favor of the defendants, dismissing consolidated actions to exclude plaintiffs from the requirements of the industrial insurance act, after a trial to the court on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

These three actions against the industrial insurance commission, where the appellants seek to be excluded from the operation of the workmen’s compensation act, all call for the interpretation of the amendment to §18 thereof (Rem. Code, §6604-18), contained in Laws of 1917, page 96, which reads as follows:

“Inasmuch as it has proved impossible in the case of employees engaged in maintenance and operation of railways doing interstate, foreign and intrastate *176commerce, and in maintenance and construction of their equipment, to separate and distinguish the connection of such employees with…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Denver & R. G. W. R. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. O'Brien v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McEachran v. Rothschild CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Schosboek v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API