Legal Opinion
Denver & R. G. W. R. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1922No. 3772PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
Tbe plaintiff made application to this court for a writ of certiorari to review certain proceedings of tbe Industrial Commission of Utah, hereinafter called Commission. Tbe proceedings which we are asked to review arose out of tbe application by one Burt, an employe of tbe plaintiff, for compensation under our Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165) for an injury sustained by him in the course of bis employment. Tbe Commission made an award in bis favor. Tbe plaintiff made application for a rehearing as provided by law which was denied, and this application followed.
Tbe…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buckingham Transp. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Shurtliff v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1927
- Staker v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Conway v. Southern Pac. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.