Legal Opinion
Roe R. Black, Avis C. Black, Roe C. Black, Black Ranches, Inc., a Corporation, Debtor, and Thomas Hart Fisher v. Denver United States National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1966No. 17992_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
The district court allowed claim No. 32 as a general and unsecured claim in the amount of $7,488.90, representing unpaid interest due Denver United States National Bank, successor to The Denver National Bank (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Denver Bank”), on the note executed by Roe R. Black and Black Ranches, Inc. on October 19, 1951, in the face amount of $192,-222.68. 1 It stands without contradiction that the amount allowed has not been paid to Denver Bank. Appellants, nevertheless, contend that the payment by “Penny Poke Ranch, Inc., Marlon Brando and Marlon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moers v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Pitts v. National Independent Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Murphy v. Omaha Loan & Building Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Grouf v. State Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Tarascio v. MancusoNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- McLain Plumbing & Electrical Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Meyers v. Frohm Holdings, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.