Legal Opinion

Mapco Alaska Petroleum Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 7, 1993No. 550-89CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Defendant’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order of October 6,1993, denying the government’s motion to vacate the court’s decision of December 22, 1992, 27 Fed.Cl. 405, was suspended pending the outcome of the petition for certiorari in Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U.S. Philips Corp., — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 425, 126 L.Ed.2d 396 (1993). The Supreme Court has now entered an order dismissing the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted for lack of standing. Id. The order of suspension is accordingly lifted.

The request for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., and Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. v. Western Conference of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. The Nestle Company, Inc. v. Chester's Market, Inc. And Saccone's Toll House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reidell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. La Gloria Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API