Legal Opinion
Reidell v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 25, 2000No. 98-463 CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
In an opinion published on June 16, 1999, this Court denied, in part, the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Reidell v. United States, 43 Fed.Cl. 770 (1999). This Court concluded that the Court of Federal Claims has subject matter jurisdiction to hear the Plaintiffs complaint and that the complaint stated a cause of action. The parties jointly request that this Court vacate its decision because the parties have settled this matter on the condition that this Court grant the pending motion for vacatur. Although this Court recognizes the value of settlements and promotes efforts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- In re Memorial Hospital of Iowa County, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Etchegoinberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Octo Consulting Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ambase Corporation and Carteret Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.