Legal Opinion

State v. Marquez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 1996No. CF93-0540; CA A82503PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled guilty to six counts of “computer crime,” ORS 164.377(3), after he illegally accessed the Umatilla County computer system. The sentencing court imposed a presumptive 18-month probationary sentence on each conviction. The court also ordered defendant to pay $14,728 in restitution to the county. ORS 137.106. On appeal, defendant challenges only the order of restitution. We affirm.

We first address the state’s argument that the claim of error is not reviewable under ORS 138.222(2)(a). That section precludes review of “[a]ny sentence that is within the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. McFeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RouseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. CarachuriCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. A. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. A. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API