State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*265LANDAU, J.
Defendant appeals her convictions for first-degree burglary in these two consolidated cases. She challenges the sentences in one of the two cases, arguing that the trial court erred in imposing the determinate sentencing required by ORS 137.635, which applies when a defendant who has been convicted of one of a number of enumerated felonies “has been previously convicted” of one or more of those felonies. We affirm the convictions and remand for resentencing in one case.
In CA A86845, defendant was charged with, among other things, one count of first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. McFeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BraitschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. MarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996