Legal Opinion

Eloff v. Riesch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The matter was submitted here upon a statement of the case under Supreme Court Rule 3a, sec. 251.2531, Stats. The issues raised upon this appeal are numbered and discussed separately.

1. Must the judgment creditor have levied execution before Edward quitclaimed to Rosemary in order to assert the judgment lien after the conveyance?

The circuit court answered in the affirmative. It then became unnecessary to decide questions as to Edward’s homestead exemption.

Rosemary Riesch contends that Edward’s conveyance to her extinguished Edward’s interest and terminated Gebhard’s judgment lien. She cites…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jarvais v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Musa v. Segelke & Kohlhaus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Moore v. SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Beranek v. BeranekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Don Orriel Neis, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. In the Matter of Gerald E. GEISE, Jr., Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Jezo v. JezoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Matter of GullicksonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Mercier v. PartlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API