Legal Opinion
Badall v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided January 31, 2007No. 09-05-498 CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
A jury convicted Chrisondath Badall of the murder of Ramdath Durgapersad. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 19.02(b) (Vernon 2003). The jury assessed punishment at fifty-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.
Badall raises four issues on appeal. Issues one and two address the testimony of a district judge who testified as a rebuttal witness for the State. Issue three concerns testimony about a statement Badall made while in police custody. Issue four asserts that the prosecution’s questions were a comment on Badall’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Grant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
- Badall v. DurgapersadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Fabian Fabela v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
- AMSPACHER v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
- Chrisondath Badall v. Rukmin Durgapersad, Susan Durgapersad, Reshma Durgapersad and Rekha Durgapersad, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.