AMSPACHER v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.
Jacob Rufus Amspacher appeals a conviction by a jury for Illumination of Aircraft by Intense Light. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 42.14 (Vernon Supp. 2008). Am-spacher contends that the evidence was factually insufficient for the jury to have found him guilty and .that the trial court erred in allowing testimony regarding his conduct and statements when he was approached by law enforcement. Because we find that the evidence was factually sufficient and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the admission of evidence, we affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Lancon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Gigliobianco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aroldo Humberto Cadriel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
- Cody Johnson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2021
- Edward Lee Carter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Timothy Wayne Fisher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015