Legal Opinion
Schonberger v. Culbertson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 9, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.
Plaintiff moved to strike out as insufficient two separate defenses in defendants’ answer.
The action was brought by the infant plaintiff to recover the sum of $1,685 alleged to have been paid to defendants pursuant to the terms of a written contract, which provided that the plaintiff, a violinist, was to give recitals under the exclusive management of the defendants.
The first separate defense alleges that the contract was made between the defendants, as parties of the first part, and the infant plaintiff and his father, as the parties of the second part, and that the father signed the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mobinco Brokerage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Esselstyn v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Wittner v. Burr Avenue Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by11 opinions
- MINERS'AND MERCHANTS'BANK v. GidleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. HanselDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Digene Corp. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Preferred Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Scheller v. Bowery Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.