Legal Opinion

Digene Corp. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 7, 2004No. CIV.A.01-752 KAJPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POST-TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

JORDAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a patent infringement case. On November 19, 2001, plaintiff Digene Corporation (“Digene”) filed a complaint of patent infringement against defendant Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (“Venta-na”). (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 1.) Digene subsequently amended its complaint twice, adding additional counts against Ventana and adding an additional defendant, Beck-man Coulter, Inc. (“Beckman”), to the lawsuit. (D.I.119, 174.) The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent No. 4,849,332, entitled “Human Papilloma Virus 35…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Bernard McKeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Century Pacific, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GmbHCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  3. Digene Corp. v. VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  4. DIGENE CORP. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  5. Digene Corp. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API