Digene Corp. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
POST-TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JORDAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a patent infringement case. On November 19, 2001, plaintiff Digene Corporation (“Digene”) filed a complaint of patent infringement against defendant Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (“Venta-na”). (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 1.) Digene subsequently amended its complaint twice, adding additional counts against Ventana and adding an additional defendant, Beck-man Coulter, Inc. (“Beckman”), to the lawsuit. (D.I.119, 174.) The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent No. 4,849,332, entitled “Human Papilloma Virus 35…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Bernard McKeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Century Pacific, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GmbHCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- Digene Corp. v. VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- DIGENE CORP. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- Digene Corp. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.