New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mobinco Brokerage Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The individual defendants moved for judgment to dismiss the complaint on four grounds. The first two need not be considered. A complaint will not be dismissed for defect of parties (Rules Civ. Prac. rules 102, 106, 107; Spaulding v. First National Bank, 210 App. Div. 216; affd., 239 N. Y. 586) for other remedies are now furnished (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 192, 193); nor because it is claimed causes of action have been improperly united. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 102; Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 96, 209, 211, 212, 258.) The questions to be determined are whether the complaint states facts sufficient to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Mallory v. . GillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Ward v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McKnight v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Schonberger v. CulbertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Hoffman v. MittlemannCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- Kelso v. CavanaghNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Miglietta v. Kennecott Copper Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.